Skip to content
How the weather was

Thing 10: Does Not Work and Play Well With Others (Or Does She?)

Here is a phrase I dread: “Okay, let’s get into groups and work on this task…”  I hated working in small groups in school, and now as a grown up, when I am in a meeting of any sort and out come the butcher paper and colored markers, I want to bolt for the door.  I do not think of myself as someone who works and plays well with others; I am an introvert and a loner, and especially when I am trying to work on a project, then I think Greta Garbo said it best in Grand Hotel: “I vant to be alone.”  So when the pleasant woman’s voice on the “Wanna Work Together” YouTube video about Creative Commons welcomed me to “a new world, where collaboration rules,” well, that just scares me.

But of course, I have been working and playing with others for some time now, without even really acknowledging it.  For a class I taught on Apocalyptic Themes in Literature and Film, I borrowed heavily from a variety of sources (example: a fantastic website called “Conelrad: All Things Atomic / The Golden Age of Homeland Security” which provided me with the so-called “daisy commercial,” showing a little girl plucking and counting the petals from a flower while the voice-over counts down to the launch of a nuclear weapon).  I’ve also found words of my own, from an essay I had written for a book on the grotto at the University of Notre Dame, in someone else’s online reflections on the nature of religious faith.  Perhaps I should have been unhappy that the lines had been used without my permission, since now I know that everything I created is assumed to be copyright protected.  Mostly, though, I was flattered.

The kind of collaboration that Creative Commons seems to allow is the best kind, collaboration of one (or more) person’s WORK with someone else’s work.  No meetings!  No personalities! No butcher paper!

Thing 7a: A Brand New Addiction, or Why Google Reader is the Best Thing Since the Printing Press

This just in: we live in an orderly universe.  Don’t believe it?  I wouldn’t have either, but I just listened to a podcast of one of my favorite radio programs, “Are We Alone: Science Radio for Thinking Species,” and I am assured that it is true.  The episode was entitled “Swarm in Here…Or Is It Just Me?” and it was about collective intelligence as it is exhibited in nature.

But here’s the really exciting thing: I just listened to a podcast! I had heard the term podcast and had an idea about what it was, but I didn’t know how to make it happen.  Years ago, I had an elaborate system for taping radio programs, consisting of a boom box, cassette tapes and the sort of device that turns lights on and off in the house when you are away on vacation.  It was awkward at best.  But now I can have radio programs delivered to my Google Reader or my Ipod any time!  In addition to Are We Alone, I am also subscribed to A Prairie Home Companion, Fresh Air, and Wait Wait, Don’t Tell Me.  And I just thought of another!  Selected Shorts!

The real trick for me, though, is to enjoy Google Reader without going overboard (ah, but that’s true of everything in life, right?).  I can skim and scan, but if I am really interested, I READ.  Yesterday I realized with alarm that I had been reviewing my Google Reader feeds for almost two hours!  I learned a lot (and my long-suffering friends and family are going to learn a lot too, because I am compelled to share), but two hours is too long.

So far, though, I am hooked and happily so.

Digital Natives, My Aunt Fanny

I always knew there was something wrong with the “digital natives, digital immigrants” dichotomy!  Here is a great blog post from Chris Betcher at Betchablog on this widely accepted myth.

Some excerpts:

But when we see these kids we make the mistaken assumption of thinking that they are representative of their generation, that all kids are like them. These kids are the ones we hold up as the digital natives, the ones who marvel us with just how intuitively they are when it comes to using technology.  The problem is that they are NOT really representative of their whole generation.  They are freaks – naturally good at technology in the same way that others are naturally good at swimming or gymnastics or drawing or singing.

I think we make a huge error of judgment if we assume that just because a 14 year old takes a lot of photos with their phone and sends 300+ texts a month that they have some sort of innate “native” status. We seem to assume that because they use tools like Google to find information, that they understand how to do it well.   And we assume that because they might have 200 friends on Facebook that they understand what it means to live in a digital world.

It’s a dangerous myth because it has some real implications for how we approach technology in schools.  If we believe that “all kids are good with technology and all adults aren’t”, which, in its most basic terms, is the kind of polarised thinking that the native/immigrant myth perpetuates, it can play out in schools with all sorts of bizarre unstated beliefs…

  • “As long as the hardware and software is available, it will make the learning more effective since the kids already know how to use it”
  • “We don’t need to actively teach the responsible use of social tools… the kids already know how to use them”
  • “As a teacher I don’t need to really understand this stuff, since the kids will figure it out”
  • “It’s ok to be a basic user of technology, since the kids are all experts at using computers”
  • Using technology in class is not that important, since the kids spend so much time using it out of school anyway”

… all of which are ridiculously untrue of course, but if you look for these unspoken beliefs it’s amazing how often you find them.

Thing 1: Reflections on Lifelong Learning, or Does Blogging Count as Reading and Writing?

I know that this course is primarily about technology, so I feel quite the fuddy-duddy in my insistence on books and reading.   So sue me; I am a librarian, and I believe that lifelong learning is built on a foundation of reading.  Imagine my excitement when I read that “blogging is way more about reading than it is about writing.”

I will freely, even happily concede that the very nature of reading is changing.  As Mark Ahlness writes on his blog, “I read so MUCH more now than I ever used to. But it’s a different kind of reading.” My students read–and write–all day long, more so than I did in high school, I would wager, even though I was and am a voracious reader of books.  But our students are reading online and writing online and on their phones and other devices all the time.

One of my anxieties about this kind of reading and writing, though, is that it seems to lack depth and focus.  One of my favorite commentators and authors, Nicholas Carr, has written a new book called The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. In it, he suggests that the way we read online is reshaping (really, damaging) the way we read at all.  “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words,” he says. “Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a jet ski.”  And don’t even get me started on what emailing and texting have done to the quality of writing (LOL).

I have had the same feeling, reading online, as if my brain is literally leaping from one thing to the next, sometimes very productively and in an interesting and informing kind of way, don’t get me wrong.  But when I read, really read with attention, I can also feel my brain ENGAGE, like it is slipping into gear and staying there for the duration of the ride.

I am a big fan of Sustained Silent Reading programs, and my students have at least one day of SSR in class every week.  The benefits are undeniable, and I hear it from the formerly reluctant readers themselves.  A student in my senior English class last semester wrote, “Up until this year, I was not that big of a reader, but now all I like to do sometimes is just read.  Reading has become something fun and enjoyable for me, and I am excited to see which book off my bookshelf I will choose next.”  (Why is this such good news?  Because there are great benefits to free voluntary reading of this sort.)

The mother of another of my students turned up in my office late in the semester and said, “I don’t know what is going on in your class, but my son is all of a sudden reading again, all the time.”  And one other student spent about half of the semester flipping half-heartedly through magazines during SSR time (magazines are fine, but half-heartedness is not) until one day she came to class without anything to read at all.  I told her she had to read SOMETHING, so she browsed our classroom bookshelves, picked up Twilight and…well, I didn’t have to encourage her to read ever again.  She blazed through the four-book series and told me she was up early and late reading, reading, reading.  I’ve had some of my best library customers tell me a similar story too (mostly having to do with Harry Potter), that a single deep reading experience transformed them forever.   I have not yet had anyone tell me that a blog changed their lives.

I also observed that this class became MORE engaged as the semester went on, not just with SSR but with classroom discussion, projects, essay-writing, everything.  And this was a second-semester Senior-level class; I mean, they had already gotten into college and they could have been coasting.  I can’t prove that it was SSR that made the difference, but the experience was a pleasant change from my previous second-semester Senior class which did not do SSR.   And all I had to do was give this group 20 minutes a week that was sacred reading time.

So while I am intrigued by Mark Ahlness’s inclusion of blogs for SSR in his own classroom (and I plan to try it in mine in the fall), I am concerned about whether blog-reading will be deep, focused, truly sustained reading or just more point and click, more skimming and scanning, the kind of zipping along the surface that Carr describes.  Which is fine, if you are on a jet ski.  But if you are meant to be diving deep, surface-zipping does not get it done.  The real trick will be to know what your goal is, and whether blogging will accomplish it.  I am (honestly!) willing to keep an open mind.  But also an open book. : )

All good books are alike in that they are truer than if they had really happened, and after you are finished reading one, you will feel that all that happened to you, and afterwards it all belongs to you; the good and the bad, the ecstasy, the remorse, and sorrow, the people and the places and how the weather was.
~ Ernest Hemingway ~